Magnetic Resonance
MR ScanWise implant (MROC)
Confidently scan patients with MR Conditional implants
To simplify your scanning process for patients with MR Conditional implants, Philips MR ScanWise Implant (MROC) software provides step-by-step guidance to enter the condition values of the implant manufacturer. Your MR system then automatically applies these values for the entire examination. Philips MR ScanWise Implant empowers you to serve this growing patient population with confidence and can help you to enhance your reputation and increase your referrals.
Demonstrated results of ScanWise Implant
Easy set-up of scanning parameters
MR ScanWise Implant helps to reduce guesswork and additional user calculations by guiding the user through simple steps to enter the MR Conditional parameters as specified by the implant manufacturer. You don’t need to do any calculations or repeatedly add or check information for every sequence of your exam.
Set parameters for all scans only once
With MR ScanWise Implant you enter the parameter values of the Conditional implant only once for the whole exam, rather than scan by scan. It automatically adjusts the scan parameters for all scans and pre-scans.
Enter limits in three minutes or less
MR ScanWise Implant promotes efficiency. With the help of the guided user interface the implant conditions can be entered in three minutes or less.
MR Workspace
MR Workspace is the MR console designed to support efficiency and staff satisfaction in the control room through integrated AI assistance, task guidance and automation. It helps technologists to manage their workload and keep the daily schedule under control while maintaining focus on the patient. It provides guided and automated workflow and includes step-by-step coaching towards AV analysis. 80% of examination planning is fully automated and results are sent to PACS in 30% less time12.
1/2
Frequently asked questions
Footnotes
- Results based on survey from 9 technologists in SCM IRM Belledone. Results from case studies are not predictive of results in other cases. Results in other cases may vary.
- Only for use with MR Safe or MR Conditional Implants by strictly following the Instructions For Use.
- Compared to Philips O-MAR XD.
- Tatlisumak T, Is CT or MRI the Method of Choice for Imaging Patients With Acute Stroke? Why Should Men Divide if Fate Has United? Stroke. 2002;33:2144 –2145.
- Kayhan A et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Apr;20(2):105-12.
- Demehri S et al. Conventional and novel imaging modalities in osteoarthritis: current state of the evidence. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015 May;27(3):295-303.
- Parizel PM et al. “Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain”, in Reimer P et al. (eds.) Clinical MR Imaging (2010) 107-195, Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
- Filippi M et al. “EFNS task force: the use of neuroimaging in the diagnosis of dementia” Eur J Neurol (2012) 19: 1487–1511.
- Ferreira AM et al. MRI-conditional pacemakers: current perspectives. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research. 2014;7:115–124.
- Beinart R and Nazarian S. Effects of External Electrical and Magnetic Fields on Pacemakers and Defibrillators. From Engineering Principles to Clinical Practice. Circulation. 2013;128:2799-2809.
- Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Establishing Safety and Compatibility of Passive Implants in the Magnetic Resonance (MR) Environment. 2014;1685.
- Compared to a workstation.
Disclaimer
Results are specific to the institution where they were obtained and may not reflect the results achievable at other institutions. Results in other cases may vary.